Kithure Kindiki has questioned the timing of medical claims presented in court regarding Rigathi Gachagua’s health, asking why a doctor allegedly waited nearly one and a half years before informing the court about a reported heart condition.
The remarks emerged during ongoing legal proceedings connected to Gachagua’s impeachment and related court battles. Kindiki’s side raised concerns about the credibility and timing of the medical evidence, suggesting that the delay in presenting such information could affect how the court interprets the claims.
According to arguments presented, if the condition was serious and relevant to the case, questions remain as to why it was not disclosed earlier during previous stages of the proceedings. The issue has now become part of the broader legal debate surrounding the impeachment dispute.
Supporters of Rigathi Gachagua, however, argue that medical matters are sensitive and that individuals have a right to privacy regarding their health conditions. They insist that any medical evidence submitted before the court should be assessed professionally rather than politically.
Legal analysts note that health-related evidence can sometimes influence court proceedings, particularly where questions of fitness, stress, or procedural fairness are involved.
However, courts typically require such evidence to meet strict standards of credibility and relevance.
The exchange adds another dramatic layer to the high-profile case, which continues to attract national attention due to its political and constitutional implications.
As hearings proceed, the court is expected to evaluate all submissions carefully before making determinations on the contested issues raised by both sides.
